data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f515d/f515d8642f74581dd3d04f3ca226eb923447ec90" alt=""
If I hadn’t seen so many times how the mass media get it wrong I wouldn’t believe it either. At some point, one is faced with the realization that the media have an agenda and the agenda doesn’t have much to do with facilitating public debate on critical public policy issues...kind of makes you wonder what is really going on.
Remember the ozone depletion debate, how it raged in the media for a few years and then just...disappeared. Media coverage and the debate surrounding the issue disappeared due to the results of experiments based on the Rowland-Molina (both won the Nobel Prize for their work) model of ozone depletion in the upper atmosphere, an event the media covered poorly or not at all. Unfortunately, such decisive evidence is not available for an issue as complex as climate change. However, climate models are continually being refined and circumstantial evidence continues to accumulate. So much so that only a very few credible climate scientists are in the ‘change is not happening--or--there is nothing we can do about it anyway, so why bother’ camp. These are the folks you see on television.
So, if you’re interested in what mainstream climate scientists think about climate change, got to Real Climate. Then, go buy yourself a bicycle and get used to it.
3 comments:
Fantastic link! My husband's will be thrilled! Thank you for posting it. I'll be sending it on to a few friends.
Nice blog, BTW. :-) I wandered onto it by accident. (long slow morning) Glad Sadie had a warm comfy last few months.
I'm so tickled you found it...and all the way from Scotland-wow!
LOL I know what you mean. I'm semi-addicted to checking my blog counter thing to see where in the world people are reading me. It's addictive to think you can sit at a keyboard and kind of wave "hello" at someone on the other side of the planet.
Post a Comment